• Join ccmfans.net

    ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!

    If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.

    ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.

Paramount - Urgent action for members

Rising Sun

Well-Known Member
At the moment it is not unreasonable to assume that Hanlon's Razor is likely to apply with anything involving the APL.

Some of the twitter speculation you refer to is actually coming from the one bloke on the football side of the fence who should know exactly what is happening.
 

turbo

Well-Known Member
At the moment it is not unreasonable to assume that Hanlon's Razor is likely to apply with anything involving the APL.

Some of the twitter speculation you refer to is actually coming from the one bloke on the football side of the fence who should know exactly what is happening.
It seems like there is a lot of fault on the P+ side too. Even just down to the lack of talk about improvements and bare bones year 1 service was all very amateur.
 

Corsair

Well-Known Member
It seems like there is a lot of fault on the P+ side too. Even just down to the lack of talk about improvements and bare bones year 1 service was all very amateur.
All that seems to be coming from P- is silence, they don't respond to anything with any meaningful information. I actually wonder if they even have any staff in Australia. Having said that if you look at sources like reddit, reports are their service and product in other countries like the UK is just as poor. Their aussie posts about A-league are full of people asking if they have pause and rewind yet.
 
Last edited:

Tevor

Well-Known Member
Pretty obvious P- has a pipe dream to be a major sport broadcaster, they by all accounts do a cracking job in the US however struggling to successfully implement anything worthwhile outside of the US.

There was a huge risk factor in the APL going with an untested and brand new in Australia streaming service. When you look at the mix up with ads in games last season to only mention one of the problems how can this not have been discussed when agreeing contracts etc. Not to mention everyone is a bit over having to sign up to another streaming service, you didn't have to be Einstein to work that one out.

I can see it now, APL couldn't resist the $$$ P- was throwing around not to mention it guarantees Good Bloke gets paid for 5 years for doing his clayton job mean while they have driven the league to it's lowest ratings and crowd attendances in probably the history of the league (not sure only guessing but the metrics are very bad).

The APL signed up with these clowns for 5 years, they can't pass the buck on this one. We all know how good these APL nuffties are at avoiding responsibility. Must be annoying for them they can't blame Covid any more despite every other sport in Australia surviving to an acceptable level.
 

turbo

Well-Known Member
Pretty obvious P- has a pipe dream to be a major sport broadcaster
The weird thing is the parent company is massive AND has a functional product overseas. Almost none of what has transpired makes any sense from their side. Even outside sport - launching without profiles? Really? No 4K or surround sound?

There was a huge risk factor in the APL going with an untested and brand new in Australia streaming service. When you look at the mix up with ads in games last season to only mention one of the problems how can this not have been discussed when agreeing contracts etc. Not to mention everyone is a bit over having to sign up to another streaming service, you didn't have to be Einstein to work that one out.

I can see it now, APL couldn't resist the $$$ P- was throwing around not to mention it guarantees Good Bloke gets paid for 5 years for doing his clayton job mean while they have driven the league to it's lowest ratings and crowd attendances in probably the history of the league (not sure only guessing but the metrics are very bad).

The APL signed up with these clowns for 5 years, they can't pass the buck on this one. We all know how good these APL nuffties are at avoiding responsibility. Must be annoying for them they can't blame Covid any more despite every other sport in Australia surviving to an acceptable level.
You say it like they had a heap of options. Foxtel used covid to screw the league and was sending it back to semi pro pay levels, there was a couple of years left on the deal which should have allowed the APL to work on engagement & metrics before going to market. From memory it came down to Stan & 9 or P+ and 10, Stan wasnt without it's drawbacks and Stan + Stan sport is mid to high 20s per month so inevitably some would have been upset about that. They have managed to put out a good and functional, modern streaming product though.

At face value the 10 partnership makes sense and blaming it for last season's attendances in particular is rubbish. 10 / P+ is at best a footnote in the things that went wrong and kept crowds away last season. TV ratings actually improved over their time on the ABC despite everything that happened btw. We don't have figures on how P+ faired vs Foxtel coverage. Some teething issues to sort out like ad delivery, hosts etc were understandable at first. They look to be resolved for this coming season so the elephant in the room is the P+ platform seemingly still not being ready for basic sport functionality.
 

turbo

Well-Known Member
Maybe we're just a chicken feed, tiny market they don't care about.
But then why go to the effort of launching here at all? Or go to the effort of rolling out some more limited variation of the platform they already had. Surely the play is to build a global platform leveraging what they already have in the US, not spend time reinventing the wheel region by region or hurting their entry into other markets due to stupid stuff like not having a Samsung or LG app at launch. Nothing about it makes sense.
 

Tevor

Well-Known Member
But then why go to the effort of launching here at all? Or go to the effort of rolling out some more limited variation of the platform they already had. Surely the play is to build a global platform leveraging what they already have in the US, not spend time reinventing the wheel region by region or hurting their entry into other markets due to stupid stuff like not having a Samsung or LG app at launch. Nothing about it makes sense.
All they want is AFL or NRL, they missed the AFL so next off the rank is the NRL who are hating on Fox at the moment after apparently being shafted in their last deal compared to what they just gave the AFL. They seem to have little care, I imagine their non football subscribers are more than the club members so we are becoming more irrelevant every month that goes by.
 

Tevor

Well-Known Member
The weird thing is the parent company is massive AND has a functional product overseas. Almost none of what has transpired makes any sense from their side. Even outside sport - launching without profiles? Really? No 4K or surround sound?


You say it like they had a heap of options. Foxtel used covid to screw the league and was sending it back to semi pro pay levels, there was a couple of years left on the deal which should have allowed the APL to work on engagement & metrics before going to market. From memory it came down to Stan & 9 or P+ and 10, Stan wasnt without it's drawbacks and Stan + Stan sport is mid to high 20s per month so inevitably some would have been upset about that. They have managed to put out a good and functional, modern streaming product though.

At face value the 10 partnership makes sense and blaming it for last season's attendances in particular is rubbish. 10 / P+ is at best a footnote in the things that went wrong and kept crowds away last season. TV ratings actually improved over their time on the ABC despite everything that happened btw. We don't have figures on how P+ faired vs Foxtel coverage. Some teething issues to sort out like ad delivery, hosts etc were understandable at first. They look to be resolved for this coming season so the elephant in the room is the P+ platform seemingly still not being ready for basic sport functionality.
So they picked a genuine lemon but they are still doing a good job in your eyes???
 

Tevor

Well-Known Member
Even if we are, the millions of dollars spent on the A-Leagues certainly are not. It doesn't make sense how bad the product is for the size of their investment. They just seem to repeatedly shoot themselves in the foot for absolutely no reason.
We were just a foot in the door for the real prize. To be honest their investment is peanuts in the media rights world. Good money for the A Leagues but small change for CBS. They are clearly after the other codes.
 

Corsair

Well-Known Member
But then why go to the effort of launching here at all? Or go to the effort of rolling out some more limited variation of the platform they already had. Surely the play is to build a global platform leveraging what they already have in the US, not spend time reinventing the wheel region by region or hurting their entry into other markets due to stupid stuff like not having a Samsung or LG app at launch. Nothing about it makes sense.
I'm thinking they may be separate businesses per country, maybe even franchises and they don't want to extend their IP to the franchisees.
 

turbo

Well-Known Member
are paramount currently paying ?
npl.tv is a bit of a tongue in check thing
Yes Paramount are paying the APL. If that funding went away the league would be in real danger.


I'm thinking they may be separate businesses per country, maybe even franchises and they don't want to extend their IP to the franchisees.
That may be right. Still seems ridiculous though.

So they picked a genuine lemon but they are still doing a good job in your eyes???
Decisions are made with the information available at the time. Sometimes hindsight says it wasn’t the right call but it is what it is. We don’t know what the pitches were, what assurances were given or what the contract terms are. Even if there are penalties or break clauses in there the APL might not want to blow the whole thing up right now. At face value it seemed like a good call, now not as much but hopefully it can be salvaged and P+ get their act together. In the mean time the APL and clubs need to get marketing and engaging the community so if they do need to go to market at some point they can get a respectable deal.
 

Tevor

Well-Known Member
Yes Paramount are paying the APL. If that funding went away the league would be in real danger.



That may be right. Still seems ridiculous though.


Decisions are made with the information available at the time. Sometimes hindsight says it wasn’t the right call but it is what it is. We don’t know what the pitches were, what assurances were given or what the contract terms are. Even if there are penalties or break clauses in there the APL might not want to blow the whole thing up right now. At face value it seemed like a good call, now not as much but hopefully it can be salvaged and P+ get their act together. In the mean time the APL and clubs need to get marketing and engaging the community so if they do need to go to market at some point they can get a respectable deal.
Hindsight!!!, it was the biggest gamble in the short history of the A league. You need to take off your rose coloured glasses every now and then. I know it is what it is, problem with that is it has turned out to be a disaster. I was hopeful when it was announced however also thought this could all end very bad. The season hasn't started so I'm channeling my inner Turbo positive thoughts only that by some small miracle we all get our codes and the first few rounds go off without a hitch.
 

turbo

Well-Known Member
Hindsight!!!, it was the biggest gamble in the short history of the A league. You need to take off your rose coloured glasses every now and then. I know it is what it is, problem with that is it has turned out to be a disaster. I was hopeful when it was announced however also thought this could all end very bad. The season hasn't started so I'm channeling my inner Turbo positive thoughts only that by some small miracle we all get our codes and the first few rounds go off without a hitch.
There was no 'safe' choice and staying wasnt an option. Years of neglect, much of it by the FFA got us to that point where it was between 9 or 10 and their streaming services. If something went wrong had they gone with 9 it would have been 'It's obvious the NRL loving 9 wouldnt care about the league'. I can't remember if Stan sport was running back then (edit - it launched Feb 2021) or not but both leading bids had some major risks. That's not rose colored glasses it's just me trying to be objective about the whole thing. I'm not happy about the way the 10 partnership has panned out so far either.
 
Last edited:

Online statistics

Members online
35
Guests online
512
Total visitors
547

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
6,729
Messages
380,493
Members
2,716
Latest member
ForzaFred
Top